Lead Safety Training Is Free—But That’s Not Enough to Get the Work Done
- Jazmyn Moses

- Apr 17
- 3 min read
Updated: Apr 21
Free training is expanding the workforce—but getting people from certification to real project work is still the challenge.
Who Is Actually Ready to Do the Work?
After my first post, I said I wanted to spend more time listening to people working on this issue every day. That is exactly what I have been doing. And one thing has become clear very quickly: There is training available. That does not mean there are enough people ready to do the work.
In the last few weeks, I have spoken with people entering this field from different directions. One is training to become a lead risk assessor. Another is an experienced flooring contractor who is pursuing EPA RRP certification because he is already being asked to work on projects where lead is a known hazard.
Both conversations pointed to the same reality: the people are here, but the pipeline is more complicated than it looks.
The Gap Between Training and Doing the Work
On paper, Cleveland and Ohio are not ignoring the workforce issue. There has been funding for lead workforce development. There are free and subsidized training opportunities. There are programs offering OSHA training, EPA RRP certification and other entry points into the field. That matters. But training is only the beginning.
The more I learn, the more I see a gap between training people and actually getting them into funded projects.
What I am still trying to understand is how all of this connects. Training exists. Funding exists. Projects exist. But how do people move from training to certification to actually getting on projects? That part of the process is not always clear—and it seems to matter more than anything else when it comes to how quickly this work gets done.
A person can complete a free class and still have more steps ahead of them:
passing exams
paying fees
getting licensed
carrying insurance
meeting program requirements
getting onto vetted contractor lists
building enough capacity to take on funded projects
That is a very different conversation from simply saying, “We need more workers.”
One person I spoke with pointed out that even when training is free, the next step is not.
If someone fails a required state exam, they have to pay to take it again. For some people, that is enough to slow them down or stop them altogether. Another contractor described certification as less of an optional add-on and more of a requirement for staying competitive. He is being asked to work in lead-affected environments, where flooring work can disturb lead dust—making certification and lead-safe practices essential.
That tells me this is no longer a niche issue. It is becoming part of the basic operating environment for contractors working in older housing stock. It also highlights something bigger: Not all credentials lead to the same kind of work.
EPA RRP certification can open the door to renovation and repair work in older properties. But more intensive lead hazard work often requires additional state licensure, more experience and more compliance capacity. So when we talk about building the workforce, we have to ask a more precise question: Are we training people, or preparing them to actually get properties lead-safe? We need both. But they are not the same thing.
What I’m Hearing Across the System
At the Lead Safe Cleveland Coalition convening, I heard a similar tension. There is clear demand. There are families who need help. There are programs trying to move work. There are organizations working to recruit and train more contractors. And still, the system is strained. Not because no one cares. Not because no one is trying. But because building a workforce takes more than offering a class. It takes follow-through. It takes coordination. It takes a pathway from training to real project participation. This is the part of the story that often gets missed.
We tend to talk about funding as if it automatically becomes completed work. It does not. It has to move through people. People who are trained. People who are licensed. People who are insured. People who can meet compliance requirements and actually get into the field. Safer properties do not happen without that pipeline.
At Blockson BDC, this is where I keep coming back to the same question: What does it take to move someone from interest, to training, to certification, to actual participation in the work? Because right now, that gap may be one of the biggest reasons progress still feels slower than it should. And it is also one of the clearest examples of why funding alone does not solve problems. Execution does.

Comments